Managed 20 species last night but only 53 moths in all. Best for me, as I've not seen it before, was the outrageously named
Schreckensteinia festaliella, and almost as long-winded
Semioscopis steinkellneriana. Also a single
Eriocrania unimaculella (I think, but
sangii does look very similar; any comments on that?)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d14a/7d14a9e99a39c35c8128ed08368dc1c05efdc5b8" alt="" |
Schreckensteinia festaliella |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e926/4e926e8fc0272d511f1c30fb142715bd7330442d" alt="" |
Semioscopis steinkellneriana |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e028e/e028ef9d78c81a53403aec3248fb434bdb4e0b16" alt="" |
Eriocrania unimaculella |
Nice selection Chris, especially the Semioscopis, which appears a genuinely scarce micro. The E. sangii was gen.det. I agree yours looks similar, but I think unless confirmed looking at critical characters, these are best left undetermined.
ReplyDeleteThanks Barry. I shall have to look into getting a microscope next!
DeleteI was just about to ask how there Eriocrania were being determined! I wouldn't accept the record without dissection.
ReplyDelete